Empathic writing feedback: The role of teacher empathy in undergraduate students' writing development
Downloads
Published
Copyright (c) 2026 Zahra Zargaran

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted: 15 August, 2026
Abstract
Although feedback is widely regarded as one of the most influential variables in student learning, its effects on writing development remain highly variable and poorly understood, partly because the relational dimensions of feedback delivery have received limited empirical attention. This quasi-experimental, explanatory sequential mixed-methods study examined whether an Empathic Feedback Protocol (EFP), operationalising teacher empathy through three theoretically grounded dimensions (Seeing, Understanding, and Caring), produces superior outcomes in writing quality, self-efficacy, and feedback receptivity compared to conventional rubric-based feedback. Post Foundation undergraduate students in a Technical Writing course at a university in Oman were assigned to experimental or comparison conditions across an eight-week email writing programme. Writing quality was assessed using an institutional rubric; self-efficacy and receptivity were measured at three time points using validated scales; and student perceptions of feedback empathy were assessed using the EFRS-S, an instrument developed for this study. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and written reflections were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis and integrated with quantitative findings via joint display. Results indicated large condition effects on writing quality, with the greatest gains on higher-order criteria. Self-efficacy and feedback receptivity trajectories diverged significantly across conditions after the midpoint, with the experimental group sustaining growth while the comparison group plateaued. Hierarchical regression revealed a theoretically meaningful dissociation: Understanding was the dominant predictor of writing quality, while Caring predicted motivational outcomes. Qualitative themes corroborated these patterns and surfaced an emergent metacognitive transfer effect, with students spontaneously applying the EFP framework as a self-monitoring strategy during drafting. Findings suggest that teacher empathy, when systematically operationalised, is a consequential and teachable pedagogical variable with direct implications for feedback practice in EFL technical writing contexts.
Keywords: teacher empathy, written corrective feedback, writing self-efficacy, feedback receptivity, EFL writing, email writing, mixed methods


